MFL MarMac CSD

Annual Progress Report

2009-2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 3rd GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

69.1

74.5

74.1

 

 

3rd  Grade ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands factual information and new words in context, is able to make inferences, can interpret either nonliteral language and information in new contexts. Usually can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually understands factual information and new words in context.  Often is able to make inferences and interpret either nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Sometimes can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands factual information or new words in context.  Rarely is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Seldom can determine a selection’s main ideas or analyze its style and structure.

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Students at each

 ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

16.4

18.1

20.7

INTERMEDIATE

52.7

56.4

53.4

LOW

31.0

25.5

25.8

 


 

 

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

62.6

72.4

57.6

Females

78.2

76.9

87.6

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

54.2

62.9

68.6

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

80.6

85.7

82.6

 

Percentage of 3rd Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

0.0

NA

NA

Non-Disabled Students

86.4

NA

NA

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS 3rd  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

72.8

81.8

77.5

 

 

3rd  Grade ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands math concepts, solves word problems, and  interprets data from graphs and tables.  Usually is able to use estimation methods.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually can understand math concepts, interpret data from graphs and tables and solve word problems.  Sometimes is able to use estimation methods.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Sometimes can understand math concepts, but seldom is able to solve word problems, use estimation methods or interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Students at each

ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

7.3

16.3

10.3

INTERMEDIATE

65.5

65.5

67.2

LOW

27.3

18.2

22.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

71.9

86.1

80.7

Females

73.8

76.9

75.1

 

 

 

Percentage of 3rd  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

(Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

58.4

74.0

71.4

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

83.9

89.4

86.9

 

Percentage of 3rd Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

45.5

NA

NA

Non-Disabled Students

79.5

NA

NA

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 4th GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

83.1

79.0

73.1

 

 

4th Grade ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands factual information and new words in context, is able to make inferences, can interpret either nonliteral language or information in new contexts, and can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually understands factual information and new words in context.  Usually is able to make inferences and interpret either nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Often can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands factual information or new words in context.  Sometimes is able to make inferences and interpret either nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Rarely can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students at each

 ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

9.8

21.1

20.7

INTERMEDIATE

73.3

57.9

53.4

LOW

16.9

21.1

25.8

 


 

 

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

80.0

73.5

71.4

Females

87.1

86.8

75.1

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

79.4

70.3

60.0

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

86.4

86.6

85.1

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

15.4

NA

Non-Disabled Students

NA

97.8

NA

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS 4th GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

81.1

80.7

88.4

 

 

4th Grade ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands math concepts, solves word problems, and often is able to use estimation methods.  Can interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually can understand math concepts and solve word problems.  Sometimes is able to use estimation methods and usually can interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Sometimes can understand math concepts, but seldom is able to solve word problems.  Rarely is able to use estimation methods or interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students at each

ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

21.7

14.0

19.2

INTERMEDIATE

59.4

66.7

69.2

LOW

18.8

19.3

11.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

90.0

79.4

92.9

Females

68.9

82.6

83.3

 

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

(Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

75.1

66.6

84.0

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

86.4

93.3

92.5

 

 

 

Percentage of 4th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

46.2

NA

Non-Disabled Students

NA

91.0

NA

 

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 5th  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

79.2

86.3

75.5

 

 

5th  Grade ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands factual information and new words in context, is able to make inferences, can interpret either nonliteral language and information in new contexts. Can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually understands factual information and new words in context.  Often is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language and information in new contexts.  Usually can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands factual information or new words in context.  Rarely is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Seldom can determine a selection’s main ideas or analyze its style and structure.

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Students at each

 ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

11.3

17.8

2.0

INTERMEDIATE

67.9

68.5

73.5

LOW

20.8

13.6

24.4

 


 

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

71.3

85.0

74.1

Females

88.0

87.9

77.2

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

79.0

77.2

59.1

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

79.4

94.8

88.9

 

 

Percentage of 5th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

NA

9.1

Non-Disabled Students

NA

NA

94.7

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS 5th  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

90.5

80.9

75.5

 

 

5th  Grade ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands math concepts, solves word problems, and interprets data from graphs and tables.  Usually can use estimation methods.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually can understand math concepts, solve word problems, and interpret data from graphs and tables.  Sometimes is able to use estimation methods.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom can understand math concepts or solve word problems.  Rarely is able to use estimation methods or interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Students at each

ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

18.8

19.2

8.2

INTERMEDIATE

71.7

61.7

67.3

LOW

9.4

19.2

24.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

96.4

90.0

70.3

Females

84.0

69.6

81.8

 

 

 

Percentage of 5th  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

79.0

65.7

59.0

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

97.1

94.7

88.9

 

 

 

Percentage of 5th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

NA

9.1

Non-Disabled Students

NA

NA

94.8

 

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 6th  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

66.8

70.2

70.2

 

 

6th  Grade ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands factual information and new words in context, is able to make inferences, and can interpret nonliteral language and information in new contexts. Can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually understands factual information and new words in context.  Often is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Usually can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands factual information or new words in context.  Rarely is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Seldom can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Students at each

 ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

10.6

12.3

10.8

INTERMEDIATE

56.2

57.9

59.4

LOW

33.4

29.9

29.7

 


 

 

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

72.0

69.9

70.8

Females

62.5

70.3

69.8

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

55.5

47.6

58.8

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

76.6

83.3

80.0

 

Percentage of 6th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

15.4

20.0

NA

Non-Disabled Students

81.9

80.9

NA

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS 6th  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

63.2

66.6

74.3

 

 

6th  Grade ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands math concepts and solves word problems. Usually is able to use estimation methods and interpret data from graphs and tables. 

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually can understand math concepts, solve word problems, and interpret data from graphs and tables.  Sometimes is able to use estimation methods.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Sometimes can understand math concepts, but seldom is able to solve word problems,  use estimation methods or interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Students at each

ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

14.1

15.8

20.3

INTERMEDIATE

49.1

50.8

54.0

LOW

36.8

33.3

25.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

68.0

66.6

80.5

Females

59.3

66.6

66.6

 

 

 

Percentage of 6th  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

51.8

42.8

64.8

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

73.3

80.5

82.5

 

 

Percentage of 6th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

7.7

20.0

NA

Non-Disabled Students

79.6

76.7

NA

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Students with Disabilities--  The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 7th  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

81.7

67.8

75.5

 

 

7th  Grade ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands factual information and new words in context, is able to make inferences, and can interpret nonliteral language and information in new contexts. Can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually understands factual information and new words in context.  Often is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Sometimes can determine a selection’s main ideas and analyze its style and structure.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands factual information or new words in context.  Rarely is able to make inferences and interpret nonliteral language or information in new contexts.  Seldom can determine a selection’s main ideas or analyze its style and structure.

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Students at each

 ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

10.0

12.5

14.1

INTERMEDIATE

71.7

55.3

61.4

LOW

18.3

32.1

24.5

 


 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

77.7

66.6

79.2

Females

84.8

68.9

71.4

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES)  versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

66.7

56.0

49.9

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

91.6

77.5

91.4

 

 

Percentage of 7th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

7.7

10.0

Non-Disabled Students

NA

86.0

89.3

 

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS 7th  GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

78.3

60.7

73.7

 

 

 

7th Grade ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands math concepts, solves word problems, and interprets data from graphs and tables.  Usually can use estimation methods.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually can understand math concepts, solves word problems, and interpret data from graphs and tables.  Sometimes is able to use estimation methods.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands math concepts, solves word problems, or uses estimation methods.  Sometimes is able to interpret data from graphs or tables.

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Students at each

ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

13.3

17.8

22.8

INTERMEDIATE

65.0

42.9

50.9

LOW

21.6

39.3

26.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

74.0

66.6

82.7

Females

81.9

55.1

64.3

 

 

 

Percentage of 7th  Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

70.8

44.0

50.0

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

83.2

74.2

88.5

 

 

 

Percentage of 7th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

0.0

30.0

Non-Disabled Students

NA

79.1

83.0

 

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 8th GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

72.3

79.0

63.6

 

 

8th Grade ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands factual information and new words in context, is able to make inferences, and can interpret information in new contexts.  Can determine a selection’s main ideas, identify its author’s purpose or viewpoint, and analyze its style and structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually understands factual information and new words in context.  Often is able to make inferences and interpret information in new contexts.  Sometimes can determine a selection’s main ideas, identify it author’s purpose or viewpoint, and analyze its style and structure.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom understands factual information or new words in context.  Rarely is able to make inferences or interpret information in new contexts.  Seldom can determine a selection’s main ideas, identify its author’s purpose or viewpoint. 

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students at each

ITBS Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

12.3

8.0

16.3

INTERMEDIATE

60.0

71.0

47.3

LOW

27.7

21.0

36.4

 

 

 

 


 

Percentage of 8th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

53.2

81.4

59.2

Females

90.9

77.2

67.9

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

66.7

70.8

40.8

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

75.0

84.1

78.7

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

NA

8.3

Non-Disabled Students

NA

NA

79.1

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS  8th GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

69.3

80.9

60.1

 

 

8th Grade ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Understands math concepts and is able to solve word problems.  Usually can use estimation methods.  Is able to interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Usually can understand math concepts and sometimes is able to solve word problems.  Sometimes can use estimation methods and usually is able to interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Seldom can understand math concepts or solve word problems.  Rarely can use estimation methods or interpret data from graphs and tables.

 

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students at each

ITBS Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

10.8

19.0

12.8

INTERMEDIATE

58.5

61.9

47.3

LOW

30.8

19.1

40.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Percentage of 8th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

56.3

82.1

55.5

Females

81.9

80.0

64.2

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES)  versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

57.1

70.8

40.9

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

74.9

87.2

72.8

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

NA

8.3

Non-Disabled Students

NA

NA

74.4

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCIENCE  8th GRADE ITBS ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient in Science

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITBS.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

76.9

90.4

60.0

 

 

8th Grade ITBS Science Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Levels:  Usually understands ideas related to Earth and the universe and to the life sciences.  Understands ideas related to the physical sciences and is able to demonstrate the skills of scientific inquiry.

 

Intermediate Performance Levels:  Sometimes understands ideas related to Earth and the universe, the life sciences, and the physical sciences.  Often can demonstrate the skills of scientific inquiry.

 

Low Performance Levels:  Sometimes understands ideas related to Earth and the universe but seldom understands ideas about the life sciences or the physical sciences.  Rarely demonstrates the skills of inquiry.

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students at each

ITBS Science Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

7.7

14.2

21.8

INTERMEDIATE

69.2

76.2

38.2

LOW

23.0

9.5

40.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Percentage of 8th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Science on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

62.5

85.7

59.2

Females

90.9

94.4

60.7

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES)  versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Science on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

71.4

91.7

40.9

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

79.6

89.7

72.8

 

 

Percentage of 8th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Science on the ITBS Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

NA

NA

16.7

Non-Disabled Students

NA

NA

72.1

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READING COMPREHENSION 11th ITED GRADE ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITED.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

77.7

77.1

80.6

 

 

11th Grade ITED Reading Comprehension Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Level:  Understands stated information and ideas; infers implied meaning, draws conclusions, and interprets nonliteral language; and makes generalizations from or about a text, identifies its author’s purpose or viewpoint, and evaluates aspects of its style or structure.

 

Intermediate Performance Level:  Sometimes understands stated information and ideas; sometimes infers implied meaning, draws conclusions, and interprets nonliteral language; and sometimes makes generalizations from or about a text, identifies its author’s purpose or viewpoint, and evaluates aspects of its style or structure.

 

Low Performance Level:  Seldom understands stated information and ideas; rarely infers implied meaning, draws conclusions, or interprets nonliteral language; and rarely makes generalizations from or about a text, identifies its author’s purpose or viewpoint, or evaluates aspects of its style or structure.

 

 


Percentage of 11th Grade Students at each

ITED Reading Comprehension Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

9.6

8.8

14.9

INTERMEDIATE

68.1

68.3

65.7

LOW

22.4

22.8

19.4

 

 

 

 

 


Percentage of 11th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Reading Comprehension on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

76.4

78.9

73.3

Females

79.2

75.7

86.5

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

63.2

56.5

55.6

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

81.4

85.7

89.8

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Reading Comprehension on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

12.5

35.3

40.0

Non-Disabled Students

91.0

88.7

87.7

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MATHEMATICS 11th GRADE ITED ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students Proficient in Mathematics

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITED.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

71.2

78.5

80.6

 

 

11th Grade ITED Mathematics Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Level:  Makes inferences with quantitative information and solves a variety of quantitative reasoning problems; usually applies math concepts and procedures.

 

Intermediate Performance Level:  Sometimes applies math concepts and procedures, makes inferences with quantitative information, and solves a variety of quantitative reasoning problems.

 

Low Performance Level:  Seldom applies math concepts and procedures, makes inferences with quantitative information, or solves quantitative reasoning problems.

 

 


Percentage of 11th Grade Students at each

ITED Mathematics Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

14.8

22.8

13.4

INTERMEDIATE

56.4

55.7

67.2

LOW

28.7

21.5

19.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Mathematics on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

80.3

81.6

83.3

Females

60.5

75.5

78.4

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES)  versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Mathematics on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

57.9

47.7

61.1

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

74.7

91.1

87.8

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Mathematics on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

6.3

41.2

60.0

Non-Disabled Students

84.6

88.8

84.2

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SCIENCE 11th GRADE ITED ACHIEVEMENT SCORES

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students Proficient in Science

 

Proficiency means the combined percentage of students in the

 intermediate and high achievement levels on the ITED.

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

87.3

84.8

76.1

 

 

11th Grade ITED Science Achievement Level Descriptors

 

High Performance Level:  Makes inferences and predictions from data, recognizes the rationale for and limitations of scientific procedures, and usually judges the relevance and adequacy of information.

 

Intermediate Performance Level:  Sometimes makes inferences and predictions from data, judges the relevance and adequacy of information, and recognizes the rationale for and limitations of scientific procedures.

 

Low Performance Level:  Rarely makes inferences or predictions from data, judges the relevance and adequacy of information, or recognizes the rationale for and limitations of scientific procedures.

 

 


Percentage of 11th Grade Students at each

ITED Science Achievement Level

 

ACHIEVEMENT

LEVEL

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

HIGH

16.0

19.0

19.4

INTERMEDIATE

71.3

65.8

56.7

LOW

12.7

15.2

23.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Percentage of 11th Grade Male and Female Students Proficient in

Science on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Males

88.2

84.3

73.3

Females

86.1

85.4

78.4

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program (Low SES) versus Not Enrolled in the Free / Reduced Lunch Program

Proficient in Science on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Enrolled in Free/ Reduced Lunch Program

84.3

69.5

66.7

Not enrolled in Free/Reduced Lunch Program

88.0

91.2

79.6

 

 

Percentage of 11th Grade Students with Disabilities versus Non-Disabled Students Proficient in Science on the ITED Assessment

 

 

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Students with Disabilities

43.8

52.9

20.0

Non-Disabled Students

96.2

93.5

86.0

 

 

Race/Ethnicity—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

Migrant Students—The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

ELL Students – The reporting grade level contains fewer than 10 students

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009-2010 ITBS and ITED

LOCAL STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

COMPARED WITH AEA 1, STATE, AND NATION

Information found on the website:  https://www.edinfo.state.ia.us/data/aprchart.asp?s=44190000

 

 

Local Percentage of 3rd Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 3rd Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 3rd Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 3rd Grade Students Proficient

Grade 3 Reading Comprehension

74.1

77.6

75.5

NA

Grade 3 Math Total

77.5

80.7

76.2

NA

Grade 3 Science

88.0

83.1

80.3

NA

 

 

 

 

Local Percentage of 4th Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 4th Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 4th Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 4th Grade Students Proficient

Grade 4 Reading Comprehension

73.1

78.7

77.6

60.0

Grade 4 Math Total

88.4

81.7

79.2

60.0

Grade 4 Science

80.8

84.8

83.8

60.0

 

 

 

 

Local Percentage of 5th Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 5th Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 5th Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 5th Grade Students Proficient

Grade 5 Reading Comprehension

75.5

78.4

77.6

NA

Grade 5 Math Total

75.5

82.4

79.7

NA

Grade 5 Science

73.5

84.8

83.0

NA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local Percentage of 6th Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 6th Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 6th Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 6th Grade Students Proficient

Grade 6 Reading Comprehension

70.2

70.6

69.4

NA

Grade 6 Math Total

75.3

80.8

76.2

NA

Grade 6 Science

79.5

81.8

80.8

NA

 

 

 

Local Percentage of 7th Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 7th Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 7th Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 7th Grade Students Proficient

Grade 7 Reading Comprehension

75.5

73.0

71.5

NA

Grade 7 Math Total

73.7

80.5

76.4

NA

Grade 7 Science

71.9

82.2

80.8

NA

 

 

 

Local Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 8th Grade Students Proficient

Grade 8 Reading Comprehension

63.6

76.1

72.6

60

Grade 8 Math Total

60.1

79.1

75.3

60

Grade 8 Science

60.0

80.2

80.5

60

 

 

 

Local Percentage of 11h Grade Students Proficient

AEA 1 Percentage of 11th Grade Students Proficient

State Percentage of 11th Grade Students Proficient

Nation Percentage of 11th Grade Students Proficient

Grade 11 Reading Comprehension

79.7

79.6

77.5

60

Grade 11

Math Total

79.7

79.0

76.8

60

Grade 11 Science

75.0

81.1

80.5

60

 

DISTRICT-WIDE MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT DATA

2009-2010

 

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)

 

MFL MarMac CSD uses this assessment in kindergarten-sixth grade to identify students’ areas of strength and weakness in phonemic awareness, alphabetic principle, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension.  The following skills are assessed and reported:

 

Initial Sound Fluency:  The ability to give correct beginning sounds in words.

Letter Naming Fluency:  The ability to identify letters.

Phonemic Segmentation Fluency:  The ability to give the individual sounds that make up words.

Nonsense Word Fluency:  The ability to read and pronounce words or the sounds that are in the words.

Oral Reading Fluency:  A timed oral reading on three passages to measure the student’s rate of words per minute.

Retelling Fluency:  The ability to retell a story immediately after reading the passage.

 

KINDERGARTEN

 

Assessment

Fall

Goal

Fall Results

Winter Goal

Winter Results

Spring Goal

Spring Results

Initial Sound Fluency

8

9.8

25

23.7

 

 

Letter Naming Fluency

8

14.4

27

35.3

40

44.4

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

 

 

18

29.7

35

48.9

Nonsense Word Fluency

 

 

13

25.7

25

34.1

 

1st GRADE

 

Assessment

Fall

Goal

Fall Results

Winter Goal

Winter Results

Spring Goal

Spring Results

Letter Naming Fluency

37

40.6

 

 

 

 

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

35

46.4

35

56.1

35

58

Nonsense Word Fluency

24

30

50

48.8

50

57.8

Oral Reading Fluency

Words Per Minute

 

 

20

36.7

40

57.2

Retelling Fluency

 

 

10

17.9

20

24.8

 

 

DISTRICT-WIDE MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT DATA

2009-2010

 

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)

 

MFL MarMac CSD uses this assessment in kindergarten-sixth grade to identify students’ areas of strength and weakness in phonemic awareness, alphabetic principle, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension.  The following skills are assessed and reported:

 

Nonsense Word Fluency:  The ability to read and pronounce words or the sounds that are in the words.

 

Oral Reading Fluency:  A timed oral reading on three passages to measure the student’s rate of words per minute.

 

Retelling Fluency:  The ability to retell a story immediately after reading the passage.

 

 

 

2nd GRADE

 

Assessment

Fall

Goal

Fall Results

Winter Goal

Winter Results

Spring Goal

Spring Results

Nonsense Word Fluency

50

75.1

 

 

 

 

Oral Reading Fluency

Words Per Minute

44

55.2

68

87

90

101.4

Retelling Fluency

22

24

34

36.6

45

45.5

 

 

 

3rd GRADE

 

Assessment

Fall

Goal

Fall Results

Winter Goal

Winter Results

Spring Goal

Spring Results

Oral Reading Fluency

Words Per Minute

77

79.7

92

96.5

110

109.4

Retelling Fluency

38

40.8

46

46.2

55

48.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISTRICT-WIDE MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT DATA

2009-2010

 

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)

 

MFL MarMac CSD uses this assessment in kindergarten-sixth grade to identify students’ areas of strength and weakness in phonemic awareness, alphabetic principle, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension.  The following skills are assessed and reported:

 

Oral Reading Fluency:  A timed oral reading on three passages to measure the student’s rate of words per minute.

 

Retelling Fluency:  The ability to retell a story immediately after reading the passage.

 

4th GRADE

 

Assessment

Fall

Goal

Fall Results

Winter Goal

Winter Results

Spring Goal

Spring Results

Oral Reading Fluency

Words Per Minute

93

87.3

105

105.5

118

115.6

Retelling Fluency

46

39.5

52

61

59

58

 

5th GRADE

 

Assessment

Fall

Goal

Fall Results

Winter Goal

Winter Results

Spring Goal

Spring Results

Oral Reading Fluency

Words Per Minute

104

95.7

115

101

124

116.3

Retelling Fluency

52

50.5

57

55.6

62

56.8

 

6th GRADE